The equivalent of Antarctic research stations but in fantasy worlds like for example there’s an evil terrible region of rotting and nightmares but like nine miles from the edge there’s a very ugly little building optimistically called Observation Center 1 and it’s full of normal humans just vibing. for like 90% of the year they can’t leave because that’s Death Fog Season but it balances out because they can study the ghost migrations and also hear the whalesong-like calls of The Unspeakable Ones asking you to come outside for a game of checkers but thankfully the checkers set is kept locked up to slow down anyone that gets tempted
The reason fat cadavers are not accepted for medical programmes is that you need to cut through every layer of fat carefully. Which takes time, and lab sessions are inherentely limited in that. It's better for med students to spend that time looking at what organs actually look like in bodies. This isn't fatphobia, it's just .. the way dissecting bodies works? In the same way surgeries on fat people take longer because there's just physically more tissue. The alternative would be to force the med students who get fatter cadavers to do more lab sessions at weird times outside of the usual schedules. Or force them to stay over the holidays. Or not let them get enough time to do the lab work they need to. Which imo would be a bit fucked up especially when med school is already so difficult and time-consuming.
It’s fatphobia. Fat bodies absolutely need to be studied. To ignore an entire demographic of oppressed individuals in the medical field for the sake of convenience(?!) is violence. Did you even read the article? They called working on fat cadavers “unpleasant.” It’s fatphobia and it’s unacceptable.
lmaaooooooooo
So
The internal organs aren’t the end-all be-all of medicine, even for surgeons. It is still incredibly important for med students to learn about the skin and adipose layers. The point of doing these dissection exercises isn’t just to give med students a chance to poke around human guts. It is to familiarize themselves with every part of the body. I only got one semester into a nursing career that didn’t work out, but in that one semester I took an Anatomy & Physiology course and we did do an animal dissection and the very first thing we spent time on was the skin layer.
Not only is the practice of dissection meant to familiarize med students with every part of the body, it’s meant to give them a chance to see real human bodies. Because what you see in anatomical diagrams in text books isn’t normal. Bodies aren’t mass manufactured, they do not all look the same, and the practice of examining cadavers gives med students real world experience seeing different ways bodies can vary.
Purposefully rejecting a certain body type is actively detrimental to their education. When institutions refuse to teach their students how to work on certain bodies, the industry then treats those people as “difficult to work with” because they don’t know how to. You see it all the time in more low-stakes industries as well — fashion institutes not teaching how to dress fat bodies, leading to designers who think creating plus size clothes is too hard; beauty schools not teaching how to work with Black hair, leading to hairdressers who think Black hair is uniquely difficult to work with rather than just a texture that requires a slightly different technique.
How much extra time are we talking here? Because Anon you make it sound like it can take HOURS, if not DAYS. And yet I, a certified Superfat, had surgery on the fattest part of my belly a couple of years ago, and the whole procedure took 90 minutes. And that, of course, included the time it took to put me to sleep and controlling the bleeding, all things that a med student working on a cadaver doesn’t have to worry about.
The alternative to med students using fat cadavers is doctors working on living patients who do not have the skills to care properly for their fat patients. Which leads to them either refusing to treat those patients, or to them getting hands-on experience on living patients, instead of on a cadaver, which is the whole point of med students working on cadavers.
So, Anon, what you’re arguing here, is that it’s far more important and humane to save med students an extra (let’s be generous) hour in lab time, than it is for fat patients to have a doctor who’s willing to help them and has experience working on bodies like theirs, and therefore is less likely to cause them harm in the process.
Over and over, the argument being made, which I’m expected to agree is purely objective, logical, and unbiased is:
It doesn’t matter if fat people die.
These are all arguments I’ve actually heard, and all by people claiming that they don’t hate fat people, that they aren’t fatphobic, that their argument is just common sense, and everybody knows it:
“If EpiPens aren’t made with needles long enough to work on fat bodies, fat people with allergies should just lose weight.” - It doesn’t matter if fat people die.
“Fat people are a financial burden on the healthcare system. The NHS is wasting money on making ambulances that can accommodate fat people.” - It doesn’t matter if fat people die.
“The reason firefighters shouldn’t have to save fat people from burning buildings is because they aren’t easy to carry out, and firefighters can get injured in the process.” - It doesn’t matter if fat people die.
“Covid is actually a good thing because it’s mostly only killing fat people.” - It doesn’t matter if fat people die.
“The reason so many doctors have patient BMI limits on who they will perform surgery on, treat, or even agree to have an appointment with, is because it’s too hard to treat fat people.” - It doesn’t matter if fat people die.
And now: “The reason fat bodies aren’t studied is because dissecting their cadavers is inconvenient.”
It doesn’t matter if fat people die.
There is nothing that’s not more important than fat people’s lives. Convenience, money, time, comfort, ease - nothing. Because fat people aren’t important at all. We are expendable. We’re actually not even something that gets cut because we were never being accounted for to begin with. We are worthless.
It doesn’t matter if we die. Actually, if we all died it would be convenient. A bonus.
This isn’t fatphobia, “it’s just…the way it works?”
When I was drunk one night and watching the Jellyfish livestream, I reached out to the Monterey Bay Aquarium with a dumb question about their jellyfish… And they actually emailed me back.
(yes, these are actually my own screenshots, I am in tears laughing)
DO YOUR ANIMAL EXPERTS HAVE TO UNTANGLE THE JELLYFISH
AND THE ANSWER IS FUCKING YES, THE JELLIES GET TANGLED SOMETIMES LMAO
Latest reblog reminds me of how much it pisses me the fuck off how every queer person alive has to adapt to the usamerican style of queerness lest we get shunned by the community for being too different. I bring this up a lot but bro that time I got death threats for having ele/dele in my bio bc “by using neopronouns I was making a mockery of REAL trans people” when those are literally just my pronouns in my native language, and when I said that I got hit w the “well you’re on the internet so speak english” I HATE GRINGOS I HATE GRINGOS I HATE GRINGOS
I feel the need to miss out a crucial detail I missed out in this post I made out of anger, and no, it doesn’t add any silver linings or good context, it honestly only serves to make it worse.
In portuguese, much like spanish, we have no gender neutral pronouns. People who do not use ele/dele and ela/dela (he/him or she/her) all use whatever neopronoun suits them best in portuguese (ie elu/delu, eli/deli) because we have no access to a universal gender neutral pronoun like gringos do. When I brought this up upon them making fun of my “neopronouns”, they said to suck it up, and that being foreign does not make neos valid.
In mocking people who use neopronouns in english, you are mocking a very large sum of latin american genderqueer and trans people.
I know various latin language speakers that struggle with their identities in their native tongue due to us not having they/them equivalents, so they are forced to let go of their, in example, brazilian queerness, to appease to anglos who would harass them and call them mockeries of trans people for not sticking to what The Cis want.
When non-anglos tell you the usamerican and british dominance over queer spaces ruins things for them, they mean it. We are forced to repress our identites because you people think they’re too “out there and problematic”. We are forced to suppress our own queer culture because we don’t fit into your neat little boxes of what makes someone gay what makes someone a lesbian what makes someone trans or what makes someone anything else.
You tell us to remember “our queer elders”, but do you know of any queer latin american figures? We learn your history, and you refuse to learn ours because you already have “too much on your plate”. You disregard us and shame us for not fitting your ideals of queerness and using labels for ourselves you dislike, and try to baby us and tell us the proper way to be gay.
Your culture is not universal.
You are not saving queer people by making jabs at other queer people you don’t personally get. Odds are you are harming an entire group of foreign queers you never bothered to consider, because your anglo bubble is too self important.
If you want to do queer people a real favour instead of getting mad at identities that existed long before you were even born, here. Make yourself useful. Donate to queer brazilian housing and support programs. Your beloved dollar is worth a lot more than the Real. Even five dollars help.
earlier today i told an acquaintance in passing that i’ll often be in the middle of a novel and think “man i wish this shit were more ambiguous” and had to reiterate twice that i wasn’t being sarcastic before they believed me, so this post is to say: i love when writers don’t bother to explain everything, i love when stories end uncertain and unsettling, i love being required to think as a reader, i love when stuff makes no damn sense, no i’m not kidding
This happens all over the world, because the US government (like other empires before it) rewards charities whose “food aid” involves shipping American crops and food to a country, rather than helping that countries agriculture sector grow so it can sustain itself. In fact, the large amounts of “free” food donated by charities can destroy local agriculture because they cannot sell their crops, forcing them to find new jobs or start growing cash crops to sell instead.
Empires actively work against trying to “teach people how to fish,” because they want countries dependent on “charity” from the empire and exploitative international trade. Bill and Hillary Clinton’s actions in Haiti are despicable, but not unique.
“Charity” under capitalism is rarely done for the long-term benefit of those given “aid,” and that is by design.
I’ll be at MCM October this coming weekend, with a handful of new items, including new sticker sheet designs, a new hand-printed t-shirt and a giant kanto pokemon scroll (and some accompanying rice paper prints).
I will also have catalogues with all of my convention items that will hopefully make browsing and decision-making easier!
I am at table C-04 - this is the further end of Artist Alley down from the S6 entrance.
ALT
